The Road Not Taken |
|
Context:
"Robert Frost was born in San Francisco on March 26, 1874. He moved to New
England at the age of eleven and became interested in reading and writing
poetry during his high school years in Lawrence, Massachusetts. He was enrolled
at Dartmouth College in 1892, and later at Harvard, though he never earned a
formal degree. Frost drifted through a string of occupations after leaving
school, working as a teacher, cobbler, and editor of the Lawrence Sentinel. His
first professional poem, "My Butterfly," was published on November 8,
1894, in the New York newspaper The Independent. In 1895, Frost married Elinor
Miriam White, who became a major inspiration in his poetry until her death in
1938. The couple moved to England in 1912, after their New Hampshire farm
failed, and it was abroad that Frost met and was influenced by such
contemporary British poets as Edward Thomas, Rupert Brooke, and Robert Graves.
While in England, Frost also established a friendship with the poet Ezra Pound,
who helped to promote and publish his work. By the time Frost returned to the
United States in 1915, he had published two full-length collections, A Boy's
Will and North of Boston. By the nineteen-twenties, he was the most celebrated
poet in America, and with each new book his fame and honors (including four
Pulitzer Prizes) increased. (...) Robert Frost lived and taught for many years
in Massachusetts and Vermont, and died in Boston on January 29, 1963.", Robert Frost at Poets.org.
Summary: "The Road Not Taken" was published in 1916 in the collection Mountain
Interval, his third book of poems, it is the first poem in the volume, and
is printed in italics to be taken as an introductory piece. It is one of
Frost’s most popular works, and also one of his most often misunderstood poems.
The
title of this poem may be the key to its interpretation, if the title were “The
Road Less Travelled” the poem would have a focus on nonconformity – taking the
path that others didn’t take, but the actual title focuses the poem on lost
opportunities instead, "The Road Not Taken", and the whimsical and
incomprehensible nature of decisions. The drama of the poem is the persona
making a choice between two roads, both ways equally worn and overlaid with
un-trodden leaves. The speaker took a path, and by doing so he gave up his
chance to take the other one, even though he tells himself that he will take
the other another day, he knows it is unlikely that he will have the
opportunity to do so. What would have happened if the made a different choice?
This poem is more than popular culture has made it out to be, it’s more than a
call to go on your own way, it is a reflection on life’s hard choices and
unknowns. He knows his choice will be important and influence the course of his
life, but he does not know yet how. There may be no difference between the two
roads, but “way leads to way” and is only by setting out, by working our way
into the woods, that we begin to understand the meaning of the choices we
make.The tricky part about the nature of the future is that the speaker won’t
know how his decision will change his life until it has already changed it.
This poem has created plenty of controversy, with different analysis and
readings of its meaning competing with each other to attain the “true
significance” of the author’s message but the key point here is really the
ambiguous nature of this poem, that extends itself not only to the choice of
the right path to take, if there might be such thing, but also of the right
interpretation of the meaning of the poem. The vast majority of the thesis
presented on this poem defend that the choice was purely whimsical, and only a
few critics defend it was premeditated. We chose to sustain that his choice was
arbitrary, but that his future will be influenced by it, and he might or he
might not regret it, but this will be more a question of chance than of a
premeditated choice, because life is defined as much by chance as by our
choices.
Liliana Pascual
Teresa Garrocho
I agree with what was said in the summary. This poem seems overwhelmed with the sense of regret right from the beginning(starting with the title)and with particular emphasis in the last stanza as the poetic subject sighs as he reminisces about his decision to take one pathe over another.But also, when I first read this poem I also get a sense of Providence. It is as if the poetic subject, like all mankind,when presented with a dilemma must choose a certain path in life and we must believe this is the path destined for us. Also in lines 12 and 13 "In leaves no step had trodden black.Oh, I marked the first for another day" In my opinion these lines are of extreme importance because it is as if the poetic subject is portraying himself as a leader in a way, for others to come. In this sense he is almost like a self-made man.
ResponderEliminarCélia Raquel Pestana Martins - Nº: 44164
I have to say that I agree with you two. This poem is a reflection of what happens when we choose one thing instead of other, even if we were sure about it, but at the same time it gives us a "sensation" that we are always have another opportunity.
ResponderEliminarThe two last lines of the 3rd stanza are ,in my opinion, the most important of the poem, because they tell us that what the petic subject had chosen will have its consequences, but he does not regret of what he had done, instead he tells us that he doubts if he should ever comes back.
Carla Alexandra Pereira Neves - 44434
First of all let me say that i agree with most of what was said in the summary. However, i do not completely believe that the author has regreted his decision. I agree more with what Carla Neves has said. The author does not regret his decision, instead, he wonders what could have happened if he had chosen the second path, and that is something we (the readers) will never know. How much weight carries a choice made in the present? And how will that choice influence our future? What are the consequences of that choice? That will be the everlasting mystery. We will never know because we wont ever have the opportunity to come back. Whether it was a whimsical choice or not, in a long term that will not stop the author from wondering how his life would be, if he had chosen a different path, because that's the nature of a human-being - human-being wonder "what if".
ResponderEliminarJani Rodrigues - 44014
Let me make a few points here.
ResponderEliminarPlease avoid confusing the author and the poetic subject, a literary entity that is given voice in the text.
More important than reaching a conclusion about the interpretation of a text is discussing its several meanings — by definition, literature is polysemic, and refuses to be closed up in a definite reading; and that's its major gift since it allows every reader throughout the ages to relate to a given text in her own way.
I hope that Teresa and Liliana (that forgot to sign their post, by the way) will focus more on the literary (and not only merely biographical) context of production and rely on a structural and formal analysis of the poem to ground their reading.
Atenção, corrijam o 3º verso da 3ª estrofe, por favor; onde se lê "marked" deve estar "kept".
ResponderEliminar